Yael is writing an essay about the development of folk tales

Question:

“Yael is writing an essay about the development of folk tales. Read the excerpt from her essay:

Every culture throughout time has had its folk tales, which were first transmitted from person to person with the technology available at the time. Folk tales began as an oral tradition. With the invention of written language, folk tales were recorded by community scribes, until 1450, when the printing press was invented. The result was a wider distribution of folk tales, which were collected in books.

Based on the beginning of Yael’s essay, how does the structure support her central idea?”

1. Yael gives details in order of importance, which does not support her central idea by showing development.

2. Yael gives details in order of importance, which supports her central idea by showing development.

3. Yael gives details in chronological order, which does not support her central idea because it does not show development.

4. Yael gives details in chronological order, which supports her central idea by showing development.

Answer and Explanation:

Based on the excerpt from Yael’s essay, Yael gives details in chronological order, which supports her central idea by showing development. Here’s how this works:

Chronological Order: Yael’s essay details the evolution of folk tales over time, starting with their oral tradition and progressing through the invention of written language and the printing press. This chronological approach illustrates how the methods of recording and distributing folk tales have developed over time.

Supporting the Central Idea: By presenting the information in chronological order, Yael effectively demonstrates the development and transformation of folk tales. This structure helps the reader understand how folk tales evolved from oral traditions to written records and wider distribution. The sequential presentation supports the central idea of development by showing the historical progression of how folk tales were transmitted and recorded.

Other Options Explained:

Order of Importance: If Yael had presented details based on their importance rather than their historical sequence, it might not have demonstrated the development of folk tales over time. The importance-based organization could disrupt the understanding of how folk tales evolved chronologically.

Chronological Order without Development: If the chronological order didn’t show the development of folk tales, it would mean the structure was not effectively supporting the central idea. However, in this case, the chronological approach clearly illustrates the progression and development of folk tales.

In Summary: Yael’s use of chronological order effectively supports her central idea by demonstrating the development of folk tales through different historical stages, highlighting how recording and distribution methods evolved.