How was the Three-Fifths Compromise like the Great Compromise

Subject : History

Question: How was the Three-Fifths Compromise like the Great Compromise?

A) It gave states the power to determine their own populations.

B) It determined how states would be represented in Congress.

C) It became a way for northern states to gain more representation.

D) It determined that states would have equal representation in the Senate.

Expert Verified Solution:

The correct answer is:

B) It determined how states would be represented in Congress.

Explanation: The Three-Fifths Compromise and the Great Compromise were both agreements made during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 that dealt with the issue of representation in the newly formed United States Congress.

The Great Compromise (also known as the Connecticut Compromise) resolved a dispute between the larger and smaller states by establishing a bicameral legislature, consisting of the House of Representatives (with representation based on population) and the Senate (with equal representation for each state, regardless of size).

The Three-Fifths Compromise was an agreement between Northern and Southern states that determined how slaves would be counted for purposes of representation and taxation. Under this compromise, three-fifths of the enslaved population would be counted when determining a state’s total population for legislative representation in the House of Representatives and tax purposes.

Both compromises were crucial in determining how states would be represented in Congress, balancing the interests of states with large and small populations, and addressing the contentious issue of slavery in representation.